Connect with us


Cubs Have Themselves to Blame for Ugly Offseason

The Cubs have spent precisely zero dollars on full Major League contracts this offseason. This reality is both stunning and inexcusable, rendering Theo Epstein’s “reckoning” little more than a joke.

Photo: Charles Rex Arbogast/AP

It’s the first full week of January, and to-date the Cubs have yet to make an exclusive major league pact with a free agent. If those words sting, here’s Jeff Passan with the official dagger-to-the-heart in the form of numbers:

I mean, hey, the Cubs signed Carlos Asuaje this evening. That’s something, right? If you haven’t heard of him before (and I’m guessing you haven’t!) he has a chance to make the roster as a utility piece. On a roster with few holes and needs, handing a wildcard utility-type player a spring training invite is smart, if not noteworthy.

The Cubs, however, are a team with several notable holes, yet they’ve continued to plod along this offseason making only low-risk moves that likely won’t pay off. Frustration has matured into a state of outright debilitation for Cubs fans, with snark perhaps the only cure as we inch toward what’s become the most dreaded season in a long, long time.

Granted, the Cubs have overhauled both the front office and player development departments, and the effects of both shouldn’t be understated. They also won’t have an immediate impact on what is an immediate concern: constructing a roster that makes an honest run at the playoffs in 2020.

The Cubs’ Mess is a Group Effort

For Cubs fans that took stock in Theo Epstein’s post-2018 rant following a heartbreaking-but-expected Wild Card loss to Colorado, a playoff-less 2019 certainly meant changes were afoot. The roster would be reconstructed to ensure 2020 wouldn’t suffer the same fate, and questions would be answered while balancing the Ricketts’ clear directive to dip below the Luxury Tax.

Clearly, none of that has happened.

After shelling out $348 million for the services of Jason Heyward, Yu Darvish, and Tyler Chatwood, and with rising arbitration salaries for an aging position-player core, the Cubs are finding their dance with the Luxury Tax an impossible one to master. The uncertainty of the Cubs’ financial flexibility led me to previously express consternation regarding this offseason, and the absolute mess that remains today has transformed my consternation into resignation.

Those financial constraints are in part the front office’s fault, to be sure, but no one should side with the Ricketts in their claim there’s no money to spend. The Cubs are now worth an estimated $3 billion, and the Ricketts recently sold the family business for ~$26 billion. These realities render moot any concern Wrigleyville’s infrastructure costs were double what was projected. Spending money in the third-largest market in the country isn’t merely logical, it’s necessary. This is especially true for a historic franchise that still has a two-year window to compete, and truer still for a team about to launch their own damn sports network.

Yes, there are valid reasons to dodge consecutive Luxury Tax penalties beyond the obvious, but at this stage that’s more an excuse than it is a rationale for what has been an atrocious winter. At the end of the day, the Cubs should find a way to compete while maintaining a semblance of financial responsibility. That they’ve shown disinterest in the former while obsessing over the latter is pathetic.

It’s not as if valuable, roster-effecting names weren’t available on the cheap, either. Blake Treinen would have been a tremendous ‘pen reinforcement for $10 million, as would have Alex Claudio for a paltry $1.75 million, both of whom the Cubs were either connected to in theory or in viable reports. Shogo Akiyama, perhaps the only player the Cubs might actually have pursued, recently signed a three-year, $21 million pact with Cincinnati. He would have provided the Cubs with a capable leadoff stick while manning center field — two desperate needs for the roster at an eminently reasonable price.

Alas, here we are, the (still plentiful) free agent market practically devoid of any impact names to complete this roster.

(Side note: One could express further discontent that, at a time when the Cubs are floundering, our South Side brethren are exploding with confidence, but in my estimation, it’s actually good that the White Sox are primed for contention. More on that in a later post.)

Can this Team Compete Anyway?

For those that haven’t been keeping score, here’s the list of players the Cubs have inked to deals, traded for, or acquired via Rule 5 draft this winter:

While some of these names carry upside, and while none of their contracts carry any risk whatsoever, any success they find on the North Side would be supplemental at best. Casting a wide net for relief help is always encouraged, scouring the bargain bin for utility help is proper due diligence, and taking a flyer on a former top starting pitching prospect is plain smart.

But ancillary moves for a team in desperate need of a shakeup is trusting process over performance, the very thing Theo rejected after 2018.

It stands to reason that Kris Bryant and Willson Contreras remain with the team given the Cubs’ absurd asking prices, potentially submitting career years while anchoring the lineup with Anthony Rizzo and Javier Baez. Maybe Kyle Schwarber proves last year’s second half is the new norm and not a fluke. Heyward could provide significant offensive value if he rests against lefties and doesn’t leadoff, Nico Hoerner could emerge as invaluable altogether, and Ian Happ or Albert Almora might just turn a corner.

Perhaps Jon Lester shows he’s impervious to age. Maybe Jose Quintana returns to vintage form in his walk year, Yu Darvish proves he’s a true ace, and Kyle Hendricks keeps on keepin’ on. Oh, and some combination of Chatwood / Adbert Alzolay / Alec Mills / Cotton makes for an adequate fifth starter, Craig Kimbrel becomes an ace closer again, and Morrow rediscovers his 2017 set-up prowess as the multitude of options in the ‘pen level out into a solid unit.

I write out this impractical scenario to suggest just how dire the Cubs situation stands, despite how talented and capable the bulk of the roster is. Passan’s tweet from Monday evening reminds us this franchise has sat on their hands at a time when creativity and proactive measures were required.

It’s no wonder Cubs fans are cringing right now.

Sign up to receive awesome content like this right in your inbox, from On Tap Sports Net.

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Posts by external contributors to On Tap Sports Net

Notify of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
2 years ago

I guess the Cubs ownership and management must have really been enamored by the way the team finished out the season last year. Let me refresh your memory: starting September 16th, the Cubs LOST TEN GAMES IN A ROW.

Let that sink in. Ten games in a row.

From September 16th until the end of the season, they were 2 -11. And they do nothing in response. Absolutely nothing. Well, I take that back. They signed Brandon Morrow. I say he doesn’t make it 30 minutes into the 2020 season.

Nick Castellanos was a joy to watch in the second half of the season. Yet from every indication, ownership is going to let him walk. They are not even going to try to sign him. I am in absolute disbelief over this. It staggers the imagination.

We have the worst ownership in baseball. To borrow from Mike Ditka, “they toss nickels around like they’re manhole covers.” Other owners want to field competitive teams but it’s all about the money for the Cubs ownership. If a physician let a patient that could have been saved die on the table because of his inaction, he would be answerable in a malpractice suit.

That is precisely what is happening here. The Cubs are in critical condition but the owners attention is diverted to doing whatever in the world it is that these particular owners do. But the Ricketts’, unlike the hypothetical physician above, are above the law.

Theo Epstein isn’t much better. Upon considering getting Jose Quintana at all, what the Cubs gave up to get Jose Quintana, acquiring last year’s savior, Daniel Descalso, and however it was the Cubs came to let Tommy LaStella walk last year (you can relive that one for a pretty accurate sneak preview of how much fun it’s going to be to watch helplessly as Nick Castellanos walks away), Epstein too can be compared to a “physician”, Josef Mengele. One can only guess what baseball’s “angel of death‘s” next sadistic experiment on Cubs fans will be.

Ownership and Epstein fired Joe Maddon in an attempt to paper over their own incompetence. Maddon was not the problem and one need look no further than what has (not?) transpired this off-season for evidence of that.

But I’m not bitter.

2 years ago

“We have the worst ownership in baseball”

Really? That’s laughable since I believe the payroll is still too five in all of baseball. No one can say they don’t spend….you can however say they don’t spend as much as they can afford to spend.

The problem is not spending, the problem is spending too much, for too many years, on the wrong players. That ALL falls on Jedd and Theo.

But I can never be too mad at them since they were the only people in the past 100 years capable of doing the unimaginable…bringing a WS title to the North side.

Bob Best
Bob Best
2 years ago

That’s a heck of a lot of dramatic handwringing. Take a deep breath. This roster is as good as the 2015 or 2016 team.

Remember the 2015 opening day roster?


Basically Rizzo, Fowler and some spare parts. NLCS that year.



Better than 15, but still a team with holes. WS title.

The current roster is a lot better than opening day 2016.

Austin Bloomberg
Reply to  Bob Best
2 years ago

I appreciate the spirit of your comment, but my angst exists precisely because this roster (outside of the ‘pen) looks eerily similar to ‘18 and ‘19. In both seasons the team faltered down the stretch while experiencing a lack of development from players that were thought to be a part of the core long-term. That’s a serious issue, and one that remains as we have flipped to ‘20.

I’m not dismissing the Cubs as if they can’t be a good team. I’m simply suggesting this off-season has not been what it should be given Theo’s admonition and the clear need for upgrades.

2 years ago

I am not excited to get started. First time in many years I’ve said this. Go Cubs!!

Reply to  Steve
2 years ago

Boy are you on target. I can’t believe this front office is not signed Nick C. He was the only bright spot down the stretch last year. Sitting on your hands and doing nothing to help what still is a good Corp of guys is unreal. Blame it all on ownership and the front office. They should be ashamed of themselves

Reply to  Steve
2 years ago

Like many others, I thoroughly enjoyed Castellanos in 2019, and would love to watch him in a Cubs uniform in 2020. Comparing an Epstein with a Nazi physician, at best, however, shows a lack of tact.

2 years ago

[…] low-risk signings while endlessly entertaining ways to dip under the Luxury Tax have made for a slow, painful offseason. The White Sox, on the other hand, have been one of baseball’s most active franchises, […]

Listen To Cubs On Tap


Advertisement Beer and Bourbon Box 300x250

More in Cubs